EcoSherpa | Sustainable Living Guide
EcoSherpa | Directory | Sitemap | About Us | Contact Us

May 2nd, 2007

You are currently browsing the articles from EcoSherpa | Sustainable Living written on May 2nd, 2007.

Eco Labels - 100 % Green?

green logo
In a recent Business Week article, they examined the marketing tactics of various retailers, including Home Depot. As we have mentioned numerous times on our website, Home Depot is heavily promoting their green products in Canada. On a recent visit to the store I found tons of copies of their green publication, Eco Options and walking through their seasonal department the eco options labels are everywhere. The question I keep asking myself is, “who determines what is a green product.”

There is no doubt that the eco-chic trend is becoming entrenched in North America. Marketers are jumping on the bandwagon and we are becoming inundated with their campaign messages as they try to position their products as being earth-friendly. We are witnessing how consumer opinion can have an enormous influence and impact on the decisions corporations make.

The influence doesn’t stop there, have a look at the Canadian Government and Stephen Harper. The words “environment” and “climate change” were excluded from the Harper government’s vocabulary when first elected. Through opinion polls and evaluating what Canadians deem important, the pendulum swung and buckets of green paint are being handed out by Harper and his staffers. Perhaps come election time, Stephen will wear some eco-friendly (non-animal tested) green lipstick, so when he kisses the babies it will leave a lasting green imprint.

The point I am trying to make is that we need to be careful when it comes to over-zealous marketing campaigns and look past all of the noise to really understand and evaluate how genuine the person, corporation or government is when waving their green flag.

Can we believe the Label?
According to the Business Week article, there is a company SCS, Scientific Certification Systems, that independently certifies the products that fall under the Eco Options branding. I had a chance to head over to the SCS website and this is what I found:

SCS is a leading third-party provider of certification, auditing and testing services, and standards. Our goal is to recognize the highest levels of performance in food safety and quality, environmental protection and social responsibility in the private and public sectors, and to stimulate continuous improvement in sustainable development.

If you search the site you will be able to find the questionnaire they provide vendors who are looking to become a Home Depot Eco Options Vendor. Some of the key questions:

CURRENT CLAIMS
1. Do you currently make environmental claim (s) for this product on product
packaging or collateral? If yes, what is the claim(s)?

2. Is the claim(s) independently certified?

If yes, provide the certifier name, certificate copy, certification number, and
certification report. Name___________________ Number _____________

3. Do you have documentation to support your claim(s)? _____________________

If yes, please attach the documentation for review.

4. If your claim states or implies that your product(s) is better for the environment
than other products in the same product category, please attach a brief
explanation including a description of the typical product used as a benchmark to make the in-category comparison.

For those vendors who want to go through the review process, it will cost them $750 for SCC to review their application. The price seems minimal compared to what they could gain by having the Eco Options label affixed to their product.

The official Home Depot definition of Eco Options:

Products with the Eco Options label are either eco friendly by definition, such as solar lights that use natural power, or have met certain environmental performance criteria verified by Scientific Certification Systems, an independent standards development and certification company. Eco Options products fall into one of five categories: clean air, water conservation, energy efficiency, healthy home and sustainable forestry.


Are Eco Labels Misleading?

I guess it all depends on how you interpret the labels. One of the arguments presented in the article from Business Week is some consumers could be mislead into believing that the labels are endorsed by a government agency. I think if we leave industry to self-regulate, misrepresentation will run rampant. Presently, companies are able to wave their green banner without disclosing what makes their products earth-friendly. The old saying, “Buyer Beware” holds true when it comes to eco products. I believe that as the eco-chic trend evolves into a regular habit, labeling and packaging standards will be established to offer consumers the reassurance that they are truly buying green.

From the BusinessWeek article:

Do Your Eco-Homework
“Eco labels are a great start. Companies need to educate consumers even if there’s no government mandate—there’s an ethical responsibility to do so,” says Giampietro. “But there’s also a morality of data. The brand needs to be trusted. They need to have completed research. And the label needs to add value to the customer experience.” In other words, an eye-catching logo is simply not enough.

If you are looking for more information about eco labels, you can head over to a very informative website, eco-labels.org. You can search their database and review products that tout themselves as eco-friendly. The site is very informative and will help provide you with additional insight into eco labels.

If we all bought locally from trusted and reliable sources, we would be one step closer in preserving our climate!

You can find the BusinessWeek article here.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Written by steve on May 2nd, 2007 with no comments.
Read more articles on Green Commentary and Green Business.

My Rant on Corporations

After reading the article about Prince Charles I started writing (ranting) about corporations. I was going to include the follow text in the Charles post, but decided that I needed to write a separate post.

My Rant:

I hope that in the near future we will see an eco-standard established for corporations. The idea would be for corporations to only select suppliers who are making a commitment to reduce their carbon emissions and are adopting sustainable practices. Companies that are unwilling to change their practices would be left in the dust and would face losses in revenue based on their unwillingness to change.

It will take some of the world’s largest corporations to set the stage for others to follow. Think of the power and impact retail corporations like Costco, Home Depot, Wal-Mart have on their suppliers. If they stated, “be green by 2008 if you want to continue doing business with us”, many businesses would either scramble to find a solution or fold-up shop. Without definitive recourse, many businesses will continue operating as normal and without change.

I would love to believe that corporate responsibility, moral obligation and the desire to preserve our environment, would be enough of a catalyst to bring about corporate change. Unfortunately, in many cases the almighty dollar takes precedent. Global industry needs to change the way they do business and become more selective in who they do business with! At the same time, consumers need to change their buying habits and make wiser “greener” choices.

There is a great opportunity for existing corporations to change the foundation of their business and a fantastic opportunity for new “greener” businesses to emerge and rival the businesses who are unwilling to change.

More of my editorial to follow……

Technorati Tags: , ,

Written by steve on May 2nd, 2007 with no comments.
Read more articles on Green Commentary and Green Business.

Charles to the Rescue!

Prince Charles is asking the business leaders of Britain for help fight climate change. During a speech to more than 1,200 business chiefs at St Jame’s Palace, Prince Charles asked for their assistance in finding solutions to this global problem. “If the scientific consensus is right we need to act very rapidly indeed.”

In his address he compared the fight against global warming with the Second World War. He said: “We can do it. Just think what they did in the last war. Things that seemed impossible were achieved almost overnight.” The Prince’s call for action was well received and by the end of the day, more than a thousand companies had pledged to work within and outside their organization to reduce their carbon emissions.

According the articles that I have read, Charles has had a very passionate interest for green issues for many years. He has described climate change as “the biggest threat to mankind.” In recent months he has been criticized for not practicing what he preaches. It turns out that he recently flew to the United States to receive an environmental award. Was this the best decision that he has made, probably not. However, I think it is important to not judge or minimizes someone’s contribution on one incident.

Many celebrities who have lent their name to the fight against climate change, will self admittedly tell you that they are not 100% green. I remember watching a video with Annie Lennox. In the video she quite openly states that she is not the perfect “green” role model. However, she is trying to become more conscious of her actions on how those actions impact the environment. Wherever possible she is making strides to reduce her eco footprint. It all comes back to the EcoSherpa message, Realistic Responsible Living.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Written by steve on May 2nd, 2007 with no comments.
Read more articles on Green Commentary and Uncategorized.